RECMGMT-L Archives

Records Management

RECMGMT-L@LISTSERV.IGGURU.US
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Date:
Thu, 27 Sep 2012 17:40:22 +0000
Reply-To:
Records Management Program <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
Re: Disposal Alternative
From:
Curtis Welch <[log in to unmask]>
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
8bit
In-Reply-To:
<[log in to unmask]>
MIME-Version:
1.0
Sender:
Records Management Program <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (63 lines) 
> The organization could then have the benefit of the records continued existence without the risks associated with keeping them.>

Aside from the other issues this has chain prompted, I am curious as to how much it would cost a US company to get access to the records with "This third party outside the jurisdiction of the US" and how restrictive and complicated that access might become.

Sincerely,
 
 
Curtis Welch
Senior Project Manager
[log in to unmask]
 
6206 Benjamin Road, Ste. 301
Tampa, FL 33634
813-888-8288 ext. 201
800-956-9000 ext. 201


-----Original Message-----
From: Records Management Program [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Ralph Better
Sent: Thursday, September 27, 2012 12:47 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [RM] Disposal Alternative

Part of the thinking was that records would be maintained according to the retention schedule and in full compliance with all laws. Once the retention schedule has been met the records are disposed of to a third party. This third party would be outside the jurisdiction of the US. It would be able to do work based on the records that it would now own. No records would need to be destroyed and would not be subject to the laws of the United States. The organization could then have the benefit of the records continued existence without the risks associated with keeping them.

Ralph Better

On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 11:26 AM, Nine <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> The only "benefit" I can think of to this is that since other 
> countries have different (and usually less liberal) privacy laws, it 
> would be more difficult to obtain the records from overseas 
> repositories.
>
> The thing is, in time of litigation I can see this looking like an 
> enormous dodge. If it were written into company policy beforehand and 
> signed off on, that would be some degree of protection, but I think it 
> all returns to the question -- why? And that's a question any savvy 
> judge or litigator would ask.
>
> Tam Rivera
> Senior Administrative Coordinator
> Columbia Business School
> [log in to unmask]
>
> List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
> Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance To unsubscribe 
> from this list, click the below link. If not already present, place 
> UNSUBSCRIBE RECMGMT-L or UNSUB RECMGMT-L in the body of the message.
> mailto:[log in to unmask]
>

List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance To unsubscribe from this list, click the below link. If not already present, place UNSUBSCRIBE RECMGMT-L or UNSUB RECMGMT-L in the body of the message.
mailto:[log in to unmask]

List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance
To unsubscribe from this list, click the below link. If not already present, place UNSUBSCRIBE RECMGMT-L or UNSUB RECMGMT-L in the body of the message.
mailto:[log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2