RECMGMT-L Archives

Records Management

RECMGMT-L@LISTSERV.IGGURU.US

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Sender:
Records Management Program <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Bruce White <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 11 Apr 2016 16:19:13 -0400
In-Reply-To:
MIME-Version:
1.0
Reply-To:
Records Management Program <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (29 lines)
Glen,

At the federal level OMB 06-17 might be the best.  But you'll find
each state has their own definition. Many are similar but there are
variations with some expanding what constitutes PII.  California seems
to be the most aggressive with other states such Massachusetts right
behind.

Bruce White, CRM, PMP
Radnor, PA
e-mail: [log in to unmask]
LinkedIn:  http://www.linkedin.com/in/bblanco

"Opportunities are usually disguised as hard work,
so most people don't recognize them."
                  - Ann Landers


On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 4:04 PM, Larry Medina <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> Pending legislation in CA is seeking to broaden the definition some, to
> cover things on the web.
>
> https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billTextClient.xhtml?bill_id=201520160SB576

List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance
To unsubscribe from this list, click the below link. If not already present, place UNSUBSCRIBE RECMGMT-L or UNSUB RECMGMT-L in the body of the message.
mailto:[log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2