Sender: |
|
Date: |
Thu, 7 Jul 2016 16:34:03 -0400 |
Reply-To: |
|
Subject: |
|
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
8bit |
In-Reply-To: |
|
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset=UTF-8 |
From: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
From the beginning this listserve (since the mid 90's) has been pretty
open on discussion topics - both records management and non-records
related. I've been a member since the early days and I think that is
what makes it a great forum. We have to take the bad with the good.
We have some serious discussions. But I beleive it is always great to
bring a little levity especially on Fridays after a challenging week.
Many of the questions Glen asks can be tied to records management in
one form or fashion. They make one think - problem solving so to
speak - which is part of being a professional. And I am amazed at the
creative responses from this group. They force me to look at things
from a difference perspective.
The one thing that Steve forgot to note is that attachments are not
allowed - Gary provided other avenues from which to get them.
Bruce White, CRM, PMP
Radnor, PA
e-mail: [log in to unmask]
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/bblanco
On Thu, Jul 7, 2016 at 4:01 PM, Johnson, Chris.J (MDH)
<[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> I appreciate that your viewpoint is that Steve's post was a public service announcement. I don't see it that way. Perhaps it’s the message itself or the manner in which it was delivered, but I took umbrage at it as the initiator of the requests. I think there is value in knowing that others have an interest in an issue because it creates a network opportunity for problem solving and sharing. In looking at the archives, these individuals can be identified if they were missed in the post. I was under the impression that it's one the benefits of this incredible community of professionals.
>
> In addition, creating a rule in email (which I did a long time ago) does not sensor messages, it only captures them in a folder that still has to be viewed to some level of scrutiny to determine their value. I recommend that the people interested in non-RIM topics establish a private email relationship/routine/ mechanism and keep them off of this incredibly informative RIM List Serv. Those topics won't then dilute the archive or populate the email of others.
List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance
To unsubscribe from this list, click the below link. If not already present, place UNSUBSCRIBE RECMGMT-L or UNSUB RECMGMT-L in the body of the message.
mailto:[log in to unmask]
|
|
|