We are in the process of imaging a large collection of active engineering 
documents.

When we began the project we were instructed to use a rubber stamp that said 
VERIFIED on any document that was of suspect quality or had a visually 
impaired issue.

After seeing their documents stamped VERIFIED they are having second 
thoughts. Because these paper docs are still in active use, they don't want 
them marked up and they also feel the word VERIFIED could be misunderstood 
for something about the document.

I am looking for constructive comments, ideas and advice from those with 
document imaging experience about methods they use to indicate suspect image 
quality.  (Please no opinionated lectures).

My questions:

Q1)	What is the best wording to use. Is there a standard term or is VERIFIED 
it?

@2)	What alternatives are there to a rubber stamp? ( we have used cleared 
post it flags but this is very labor intensive;  Ideally have a patch sheet 
that triggers an “overlay” but I don’t see this supported in our Kofax 
software or B&H scanner)

Q3)	Is it better not to even indicate suspect quality?



Thanks in advance,

Howard Furst



===
Howard Furst
[log in to unmask]

List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance