RECMGMT-L Archives

Records Management

RECMGMT-L@LISTSERV.IGGURU.US

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Bernard Chester <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Date:
Tue, 5 Dec 2006 11:44:24 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (54 lines)
Lee Ann:

First, for the next phase, don't leave the QC until after everything is
done.  It is better to find problems before you get too far along.

I am assuming that each person is able to bring up the images and indices on
their system.  You are going to want a minimum level of screen resolution
and quality, based upon the density of your images.

You need to make up review lists and a review sheets.  The review list
spells out for each person which documents they are going to check.  You
should try to do a sample if at all possible, and figure out what the
acceptable error rate will be. The review sheet lists the results observed
and includes:
- review of the image (it should match the original document and be as
legible as reasonable)
- check of the indices versus the document.
And reports any errors found, so you can profile errors.

Bernard Chester, CDIA+, ICP
Principal
IMERGE Consulting / PNW Office
7683 SE 27 Street, #316
Mercer Island, WA, 98040
(office) 206-230-9253
(cell) 206-979-7389
mailto:[log in to unmask]


-----Original Message-----
From: Records Management Program [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf
Of Lee Ann
Sent: Tuesday, December 05, 2006 10:02 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: [RM] QA/QC Imaging Query

My company has just finished the first portion of a large records scanning
project. Our 4 person team has begun the QA/QC process of the imaging
results. I'm interested to know if anyone has any experience with this and
might be able to suggest procedures or work flow methods.
In other words we are a group of people with varying information management
backgrounds and are flying by the seats of our pants. Each with our own
system which makes the progression slow to say the least.
Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated.

Lee Ann Goldberg
Information Specialist III

List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance

List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance

ATOM RSS1 RSS2