On Jan 1, 2008 3:51 PM, Steve Petersen <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> "For permanent records I've always advocated a hybrid solution; the
> microfilm becomes the official/vital version and the image a working
> copy."
>
>  I know that there are a couple of schools of thought on this subject but
> I'll ask the question anyway- Do you consider both copies a record?  If
> yes how is it worded in your records definition ?  If no, how are they
> defined ?
>

here's the way I see it. The microform copy is under the control of records
management and the digital image is controlled by an ERMS. When the
retention period is up both get destroyed. Not sure how an individual would
be able to get their own copy.
-- 
Peter Kurilecz CRM CA
Richmond, Va

List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance
To unsubscribe from this list, click the below link. If not already present, place UNSUBSCRIBE RECMGMT-L or UNSUB RECMGMT-L in the body of the message.
mailto:[log in to unmask]