RECMGMT-L Archives

Records Management

RECMGMT-L@LISTSERV.IGGURU.US

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Jesse Wilkins <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Records Management Program <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 3 Apr 2008 07:40:55 -0600
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (27 lines)
Natasha, 

With all due respect, why not? The fact that they have not been approved YET
is not necessarily surprising, particularly given that OOXML just became an
ISO standard, but what is better about TIFF or even BMP than XML
particularly for Office-type documents?

And for the archivists out there, some of whom have weighed in on this, What
IS your digital preservation format of choice? I don't want this to devolve
into a "film vs. bits" discussion. Instead, for born-digital documents, if
it isn't an XML-based markup language, what do you recommend be used
instead? Choose any type of documents - but include at least two. In other
words, "TIFF" is a cop-out as so many file formats are not images; moreover,
using TIFF for e.g. CAD drawings causes a loss of more than 90% of the
functionality of the original (layers, views, external references, etc.) and
so the archivist would I presume eschew such an approach. 

Regards, 

Jesse Wilkins
[log in to unmask] 

List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance
To unsubscribe from this list, click the below link. If not already present, place UNSUBSCRIBE RECMGMT-L or UNSUB RECMGMT-L in the body of the message.
mailto:[log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2