Hi Again,
Thanks to everyone for all of the quick feedback. My apologies for
several things that I have already been made aware of:
- I neglected to fill in the subject-sorry!
- I neglected to introduce myself, again, my apologies.
My name is Judi Johnston. I am a Records Manager at Solvay
Pharmaceuticals, a mid-sized global pharma firm. I have been in RM for
about 9 years.
_______
Also, I noticed that the post below was truncated. I'll paste again,
just in case:
I would like to get consensus on how regulated industry (pharma and
non-pharma) handle archival submissions. That is, is there a system in
place to handle these? Are paper and/ or e-forms used? Is there a need
felt to maintain information on who and when something was submitted for
archiving, or just note that something has been received? What
regulations and/or standards are used?
Also, if bulk submissions are received, are there expectations that
inventories will accompany them, or is it just the responsibility of the
archivist? If so, is (and/ or how) is this enforced?
________
Maybe I should be more specific...When someone submits paper documents
or media (something physical) to an archive, what are some of the
examples of the things they need to do? Fill out a form (paper or
online), give a "head's up" e-mail that something is coming to be
archived, submit a form or something through an electronic system that
spits out a barcode (thanks Melissa from Vertex Pharma!)etc.?
How is this different when there are electronic records? Perhaps they
are submitted on media or maybe through an e-mail, etc. Does the same
form or procedure apply? If not, how is it different?
Does everyone conceed that collecting information about who submitted
the document to the archive is important? I am also especially
interested in what global counterparts might be doing as well. Hope this
helps...
Kind Regards,
Judi
-----Original Message-----
From: Records Management Program [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On
Behalf Of Peter Kurilecz
Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2008 12:59 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Archival submissions was Re: [RM]
Hi judith
are you speaking of true archival submissions ie items that have
longterm historical value or are you using the term "archival
submission" like an IT person would ie for storage? Or are you asking
for the storage practices for inactive records.
On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 12:00 PM, Johnston, Judith <
[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> Dear All,
>
> I would like to get consensus on how regulated industry (pharma and
> non-pharma) handle archival submissions.
--
Peter Kurilecz CRM CA
[log in to unmask]
Richmond, Va
List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance To unsubscribe
from this list, click the below link. If not already present, place
UNSUBSCRIBE RECMGMT-L or UNSUB RECMGMT-L in the body of the message.
mailto:[log in to unmask]
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
This e-mail is confidential.
If you are not the addressee or an authorized recipient of this message,
any distribution, copying, publication or use of this information for any
purpose is prohibited.
Please notify the sender immediately by e-mail and then delete this message.
Ce message est confidentiel.
Si vous n'etes pas le destinataire designe de ce message ou une personne
autorisee a l'utiliser, toute distribution, copie, publication ou usage a
quelques fins que ce soit des informations contenues dans ce message sont
interdits.
Merci d'informer immediatement l'expediteur par messagerie electronique et
d'ensuite detruire ce message.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance
To unsubscribe from this list, click the below link. If not already present, place UNSUBSCRIBE RECMGMT-L or UNSUB RECMGMT-L in the body of the message.
mailto:[log in to unmask]
|
