I suspect that the litigation will more likely be against advisors, attorneys, etc. who arranged for such material to be placed in an inappropriate facility rather than the vendor who is most likely immunized from such litigation based on limits of liability language in the contract.

David Gaynon

-----Original Message-----
From: Records Management Program [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Larry Medina
Sent: Sunday, October 26, 2008 11:12 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: RAINdrip: Got a feeling this won't be a $1 per box payout

Not disagreeing with either of you, as that WAS the initial comment I made
in my posting.   With all of the scours I run, I'm sure I would have sen a
new story as well if there were one, and with the articles mentioning "Bow"
(which was the site of the last big fire) and also the other fire in Ottawa that happened then, it likely was the 2006 fire.

That doesn't change the fact that this could end up like another Diversified Records judgment before it's over... these plaintiffs have more $$$ to fight than those who were under contract to provide the services (and didn't) have.


Larry

--
Larry Medina
RIM Professional since 1972

List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance To unsubscribe from this list, click the below link. If not already present, place UNSUBSCRIBE RECMGMT-L or UNSUB RECMGMT-L in the body of the message.
mailto:[log in to unmask]

List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance
To unsubscribe from this list, click the below link. If not already present, place UNSUBSCRIBE RECMGMT-L or UNSUB RECMGMT-L in the body of the message.
mailto:[log in to unmask]