RECMGMT-L Archives

Records Management

RECMGMT-L@LISTSERV.IGGURU.US

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Trudy Phillips <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Records Management Program <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 12 Feb 2009 17:57:57 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (89 lines)
I like calling it a process. That is more encompassing and indicates a 
continuation.

I feel the same as you do on the word "project". Those usually  have a 
beginning and an end.  A program could also fall into the same arena, 
as programs do have beginnings and ends.

However, when records management begins there maybe a series of 
projects required to determine needs so a process can be developed.

Trudy M. Phillips
File Management, LLC
"Bringing Order Out of Chaos"
8440 Lanewood Circle
Leeds AL 35094
Office: 205-699-8571, Fax: 205-699-3278
www.filemanagement.com


-----Original Message-----
From: McLemore, Dustin <[log in to unmask]>
To: [log in to unmask]
Sent: Thu, 12 Feb 2009 4:19 pm
Subject: Classifying Records Management



All,



I have had some discussions with several colleagues here at the utility.
When I began managing the company's records, there was a desire to
classify records management itself as a project.  I had my doubts
because of the long-term impact of records management and the need to
support every workgroup in the company on a permanent basis.  The term
"project", at least to me, denotes a temporary presence.  I'm also
hesitant to classify records management as a "program."  Even though, a
program can support multiple projects - records management itself can
even support a program.  Instead I have been responding with the notion
that records management should be, itself, categorized as a "process".
The process of managing records can support "projects" of any kind and
support the sponsor/workgroup/unit overseeing it (as well as any who
might be involved).



I know this seems like semantics, but it is a very important discussion
to the longevity of records management within the organization.  I would
be very interested to hear your thoughts on the issue.



r/

dm

--

Dustin McLemore, MPA

Austin Energy

512-505-3777

[log in to unmask]










List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance
To unsubscribe from this list, click the below link. If not already 
present,
place UNSUBSCRIBE RECMGMT-L or UNSUB RECMGMT-L in the body of the 
message.
mailto:[log in to unmask]

List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance
To unsubscribe from this list, click the below link. If not already present, place UNSUBSCRIBE RECMGMT-L or UNSUB RECMGMT-L in the body of the message.
mailto:[log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2