If someone states "that employers should keep records longer as a result
of the Ledbetter Act, " it shows that they know nothing about the
science of developing and applying retention policy.

Operational (reference)
Fiscal
Regulatory
Legal
Historic

IF     IF    any of these retention factors change (because of
ledbetter or anything else) then the particular record series on the
particular retention policy schedule needs to be evaluated, and may need
to be changed.   Maybe not; perhaps the 'driving' retention factor was
not regulatory. 

I hate paper.

Best regards, Steve
Steven D. Whitaker, CRM
Records Systems Manager; City of Reno

>>> [log in to unmask] 2/20/2009 7:18 AM >>>
Courtesy of the SHRM Newsletter and in response to several questions
recently:

Better Recordkeeping

The most obvious thing HR needs to immediately turn its attention to
is
recordkeeping. Dianna Johnston, EEOC assistant legal counsel, told
SHRM
Online Feb. 9 that employers should keep records longer as a result of
the Ledbetter Act not only for "pay decisions but performance
appraisals
that affect pay and job classification decisions." 
<snip>

List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance
To unsubscribe from this list, click the below link. If not already present, place UNSUBSCRIBE RECMGMT-L or UNSUB RECMGMT-L in the body of the message.
mailto:[log in to unmask]