LISTSERV - RECMGMT-L Archives - LISTSERV.IGGURU.US

RECMGMT-L Archives

Records Management

RECMGMT-L@LISTSERV.IGGURU.US

	LISTSERV Archives
	RECMGMT-L Home

	Log In
	Register

	Subscribe or Unsubscribe

	Search Archives

Options:	Use Forum View Use Monospaced Font Show Text Part by Default Show All Mail Headers
Message:	[<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic:	[<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author:	[<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Subject:	Re: SOC Classification for Records Manager - WAS NOW How to gain formal recognition of the profession
From:	Bruce White <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:	Records Management Program <[log in to unmask]>
Date:	Fri, 20 Feb 2009 16:01:01 -0800
Content-Type:	text/plain
Parts/Attachments:	text/plain (24 lines)

On 2/20/09, Steven Whitaker <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> Collaboration of ARMA, ICRM, NIRMA, and AIIM (perhaps a few others)
> should be the direction.  Present a united front.
One way we could help our cause is if we could get recognized as a
profession at the government level.  When I worked for NARA, records
management positions were classified under the Archivist series (I
don't think this has changed.)  Most federal records managers are
classified as either Management or Program Analysts or Librarians.  I
suspect the same applies for RMs working within state agencies as
well.

The Medical Records folks have two series.  Why can't records managers
have at least one.  Or maybe I'm asking too much...

-- 
Bruce L. White, CRM, PMP
Orange County, CA
e-mail: [log in to unmask]

List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance
To unsubscribe from this list, click the below link. If not already present, place UNSUBSCRIBE RECMGMT-L or UNSUB RECMGMT-L in the body of the message.
mailto:[log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2

LISTSERV.IGGURU.US