RECMGMT-L Archives

Records Management

RECMGMT-L@LISTSERV.IGGURU.US

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Donald Mattson <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Records Management Program <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 25 Mar 2009 18:03:56 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (22 lines)
I am currently working with IT to clear legacy personnel data as well as 
reinstate the destruction of HR Personnel files. However, we have 
encountered a bit of a snag while identifying and processing the older data. 

Initially, the retention used was Term +6 unfortunately, when the last refresh 
of retentions happened someone changed it from Term +6 to indefinate and 
combined the retention for Nuclear site employees into this definition. 
Previously, we retained the Nuclear personnel records for 100 years on a 
seperate retention. 

I was curious as we obviously need to update the retention again if anyone 
has an idea what the actual regulations for Nuclear site personnel records 
should be and what standard of retention for our non-nuclear personnel would 
be best practice. Normally, I would address this during the next refresh but 
there is a project deadline and I need to create and get approved updated 
retentions before we can actually start scheduling reviews and destruction. 

List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance
To unsubscribe from this list, click the below link. If not already present, place UNSUBSCRIBE RECMGMT-L or UNSUB RECMGMT-L in the body of the message.
mailto:[log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2