RECMGMT-L Archives

Records Management

RECMGMT-L@LISTSERV.IGGURU.US

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Steve Morgan <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Records Management Program <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 25 Mar 2009 15:30:13 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (164 lines)
Donald,

ASTM E1034 - 95(2008) Standard Specification for Nuclear Facility
Transient Worker Records

ASTM E1034
Abstract

This specification covers the required content and provides retention
requirements for records needed for in-processing of nuclear facility
transient workers. This specification is not intended to cover specific
skills records (such as equipment operating licenses, ASME inspection
qualifications, or welding certifications), nor does it reduce any
regulatory requirement for records retention at a licensed nuclear
facility. Rather, the records shall contain data elements for the
following information: worker identification; occupational external
radiation exposure; occupational internal radiation exposure; lifetime
occupational radiation exposure history; security screening; medical
approval; and radiation worker training.

This abstract is a brief summary of the referenced standard. It is
informational only and not an official part of the standard; the full
text of the standard itself must be referred to for its use and
application. ASTM does not give any warranty express or implied or make
any representation that the contents of this abstract are accurate,
complete or up to date. 

Significance and Use

p>The standardization of nuclear facility transient worker records will
provide the individual transient worker with a greater assurance that
the radiation doses that may be received are within regulatory limits.

This specification establishes a fixed content for nuclear facility
transient worker records. Standardizing the content of these records
will facilitate interfacing with industry-wide record keeping systems,
such as the Nuclear Energy Institute (NEI) Personnel Data System (PADS).

The standardization of nuclear facility transient worker records will
reduce the time required for in-processing of these workers.

1. Scope



1.1 This specification covers the required content and provides
retention requirements for records needed for in-processing of nuclear
facility transient workers.

1.2 This specification applies to records to be used for in-processing
only.

1.3 This specification is not intended to cover specific skills records
(such as equipment operating licenses, ASME inspection qualifications,
or welding certifications).

1.4 This specification does not reduce any regulatory requirement for
records retention at a licensed nuclear facility. 

Note 1-Nuclear facilities operated by the U.S. Department of Energy
(DOE) are not licensed by the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC),
nor are other nuclear facilities that may come under the control of the
U.S. Department of Defense (DOD) or individual agreement states. The
references in this specification to licensee, the U.S. NRC Regulatory
Guides, and Title 10 of the U.S. Code of Federal Regulations are to
imply appropriate alternative nomenclature with respect to DOE, DOD, or
agreement state nuclear facilities. This distinction does not alter the
required content of records needed for in-processing of nuclear facility
transient workers. 

Note 2-This specification does not define the form of the required
worker records (such as a passport or central computerized record
keeping system).


2. Referenced Documents


E1168 Guide for Radiological Protection Training for Nuclear Facility
Workers
ANI/MAELU Information Bulletin 80-1A, Nuclear Liability Insurance
Records Retention
ANSI N13.6 American National Standard Practice for Occupational
Radiation Exposure Records Systems
Notices, Instructions, and Reports to Workers; Inspections, 10CFR, Part
19
NUREG/CR-0041, Manual of Respiratory Protection Against Airborne
Radioactive Materials
Regulatory Guide 8.15, Acceptable Programs for Respiratory Protection
Regulatory Guide 8.7, Instructions for Recording and Reporting
Occupational Radiation Exposure Data
Standards for Protection Against Radiation, 10CFR, Part 20




------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------

Index Terms 

exposure history; in-processing data; personnel radiation worker data;
radiation exposure; radiation worker; records retention; transient
worker; Absorbed radiation dose (by nuclear workers); Decontamination;
In-processing workers & apos; records; Nuclear facilities; Nuclear
materials/applications--specifications; Radiation exposure--nuclear
materials/applications; Transient nuclear workers; ICS Number Code
03.040; 27.120.01 



Steven D. Morgan
Records Manager, C.J. Segerstrom & Sons
714.438.3228 Phone
714.546.9835 Fax
Information is the currency of democracy. (Thomas Jefferson)

-----Original Message-----
From: Records Management Program [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On
Behalf Of Donald Mattson
Sent: Wednesday, March 25, 2009 3:04 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Retention of Personnel files for Nuclear Power Plant employees

I am currently working with IT to clear legacy personnel data as well as

reinstate the destruction of HR Personnel files. However, we have 
encountered a bit of a snag while identifying and processing the older
data. 

Initially, the retention used was Term +6 unfortunately, when the last
refresh 
of retentions happened someone changed it from Term +6 to indefinate and

combined the retention for Nuclear site employees into this definition. 
Previously, we retained the Nuclear personnel records for 100 years on a

seperate retention. 

I was curious as we obviously need to update the retention again if
anyone 
has an idea what the actual regulations for Nuclear site personnel
records 
should be and what standard of retention for our non-nuclear personnel
would 
be best practice. Normally, I would address this during the next refresh
but 
there is a project deadline and I need to create and get approved
updated 
retentions before we can actually start scheduling reviews and
destruction. 

List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance
To unsubscribe from this list, click the below link. If not already
present, place UNSUBSCRIBE RECMGMT-L or UNSUB RECMGMT-L in the body of
the message.
mailto:[log in to unmask]

List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance
To unsubscribe from this list, click the below link. If not already present, place UNSUBSCRIBE RECMGMT-L or UNSUB RECMGMT-L in the body of the message.
mailto:[log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2