Peter,

I reviewed my original posting and nowhere did I request anything other than a response from 12.5 users who would want to join a short-term discussion group to vet out issues relating to this product version.  There is no "situation."  Just a simple request.  

-Steve



-----Original Message-----
From: Records Management Program [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Peter Kurilecz
Sent: Thursday, March 26, 2009 12:31 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: CA Records Manager version 12.5

On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 12:17 PM, Steve Krementz <[log in to unmask]>wrote:

> Larry,
>
> Why do you assume that they did not conduct a functional assessment?
>  Simply installing latest version of a product and working through some
> non-critical path issues and the client thought that by talking through
> these issues with other 12.5 adopters they'd help move resolution along more
> efficiently and comprehensively.


Steve
you're original message to the list said nothing about your client having
worked with previous versions of the software. you mentioned only that your
client was in "pilot".

This points up one of the all too frequent problems when queries are posted
to the listserv. The initial message fails to provide a complete picture of
the situation.


-- 
Peter Kurilecz CRM CA
[log in to unmask]
Richmond, Va
Information not relevant for my reply has been deleted to reduce the
electronic footprint and to save the sanity of digest subscribers

List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance
To unsubscribe from this list, click the below link. If not already present, place UNSUBSCRIBE RECMGMT-L or UNSUB RECMGMT-L in the body of the message.
mailto:[log in to unmask]

List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance
To unsubscribe from this list, click the below link. If not already present, place UNSUBSCRIBE RECMGMT-L or UNSUB RECMGMT-L in the body of the message.
mailto:[log in to unmask]