On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 11:37 AM, Link, Gary M. <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> Hmmmm. A "Permanent" retention for all Personnel Files?  The Act does
> not remove the statute of limitations. It says the statute of
> limitations starts again  "each time wages, benefits or other
> compensation [are] paid resulting in whole or in part from [ a
> discriminatory] decision or other practice."



Once again this points up that many if not most attorneys don't understand
records management and more especially how retention is determined.  as an
aside i'm reviewing a retention schedule that has been developed by a law
firm for a small non-profit organization and it is what you would expect. A
nice long laundry list of document types but with no tie back to how those
documents are filed. oh! and they forgot to provide citations to the
regulations
-- 
Peter Kurilecz CRM CA
[log in to unmask]
Richmond, Va
Information not relevant for my reply has been deleted to reduce the
electronic footprint and to save the sanity of digest subscribers

List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance
To unsubscribe from this list, click the below link. If not already present, place UNSUBSCRIBE RECMGMT-L or UNSUB RECMGMT-L in the body of the message.
mailto:[log in to unmask]