I find it helpful to consider risk management principles when evaluating
bucket size.
Big buckets keep some records longer than they would be retained in a
more granular system. However, if those records are low risk, the only
real cost is for additional storage capacity and a larger search
universe. Then the question becomes: is the easier classification worth
the cost?
Conversely, the potential cost of holding high-risk records longer than
minimally necessary is great. The ease of big bucket classification may
be dwarfed in value by the resulting risk.
Your thoughts?,
Gordy Hoke
Gordon E.J. Hoke, CRM
http://gejhoke.googlepages.com
T: 1.507.534.2293
List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance
To unsubscribe from this list, click the below link. If not already present, place UNSUBSCRIBE RECMGMT-L or UNSUB RECMGMT-L in the body of the message.
mailto:[log in to unmask]