RECMGMT-L Archives

Records Management

RECMGMT-L@LISTSERV.IGGURU.US

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Millican & Associates, Inc." <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Records Management Program <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 22 May 2009 13:55:02 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (22 lines)
> *does the entire ARMA organization (records management professionals) have
this
same difficulty in determining what a record is / is not, or should be /
should not be?*

I think what you're really seeing is a debate about the responsibilities and
limitations of organizational units regarding the management of information,
all bound up into differing views of what the term "record" means to those
responsibilities and limitations.  Rigidly defining the term (or even
abandoning it completely) still would not end the debate - though it might
make it clear to newcomers just what the debate really is about:  Who is
responsible for managing what kinds of corporate information during what
parts of its lifecycle, and how?

Peter B. Lundell
Millican & Associates, Inc.

List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance
To unsubscribe from this list, click the below link. If not already present, place UNSUBSCRIBE RECMGMT-L or UNSUB RECMGMT-L in the body of the message.
mailto:[log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2