Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Tue, 6 Oct 2009 14:00:38 -0400 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Larry said: Back to the second decision... there is some value here to
consider the application of "bucketed retention periods" to e-mail that
aggregates content into 3-4 periods and ensures nothing is dispositioned
too early, but that it also doesn't take a practiced records manager to
determine how long to keep things. Dependent upon the industry you're in
and how heavily regulated you are, you might want to establish 4 or 5
basic buckets for retention.
I've never been a fan of the big bucket approach because you throw
classification out the window. Sure it makes it easy for the user to
store, but classification is one of the backbone components of records
management. How do you get around this?
John Annunziello, ermm
Manager, Records and Information
Toronto and Region Conservation Authority
[log in to unmask]
"Information is a corporate, strategic asset that needs to be managed"
"*PLEASE CONSIDER THE ENVIRONMENT WHEN DECIDING TO PRINT THIS MESSAGE*
Toronto and Region Conservation Authority Confidentiality Notice:
The information contained in this communication including any attachments
may be confidential, is intended only for use of the recipient(s) named
above, and may be legally privileged. If the reader of the message is not
the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination,
distribution,disclosure or copying of this communication is strictly
prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please
resend this communication to the sender and delete it permanently from
your computer system.
Thank you."
List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance
To unsubscribe from this list, click the below link. If not already present, place UNSUBSCRIBE RECMGMT-L or UNSUB RECMGMT-L in the body of the message.
mailto:[log in to unmask]
|
|
|