RECMGMT-L Archives

Records Management

RECMGMT-L@LISTSERV.IGGURU.US

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
John Glover <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Records Management Program <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 20 Nov 2009 07:56:31 -0800
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (62 lines)
After 25 years of converting paper documents to digital there should be some
inkling of common sense.

The key sentence for me in this article is:

Computerized records have yet to prove more efficient “because the
commercial marketplace does not favor optimal products,” creating programs
to focus more on codes and billing than doctors’ needs and patient care,
they said.

The accounting/billing departments at hospitals and healthcare centers
control the budget and have become the decision makers. We vendors often end
up talking only to them.
Work flow efficiency comes for the medical professional and the healthcare
records managers when the system is designed around their workflow needs.
-- 
John R Glover
707-773-1257
[log in to unmask]
www.linkedin.com/in/johnrglover
On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 7:20 AM, Peter Kurilecz <[log in to unmask]>wrote:

> Montreal Gazette
>
> "WASHINGTON – New electronic record systems installed in thousands of U.S.
> hospitals have done little to rein in skyrocketing healthcare costs,
> Harvard
> University researchers said in a study released Friday."
>
> "The researchers analyzed data from the industry’s Healthcare Information
> and Management Systems Society, hospital reports on costs incurred through
> the Medicare insurance program for the elderly and the 2008 Dartmouth
> Health
> Atlas, which compiles government health data.
>
> Their study was released by the nonprofit Physicians for a National Health
> Program, which backs a single-payer U.S. health insurance."
>
> http://bit.ly/Y0Agy
>
>
>
> --
> Peter Kurilecz CRM CA
> [log in to unmask]
> Richmond, Va
> Information not relevant for my reply has been deleted to reduce the
> electronic footprint and to save the sanity of digest subscribers
>
> List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
> Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance
> To unsubscribe from this list, click the below link. If not already
> present, place UNSUBSCRIBE RECMGMT-L or UNSUB RECMGMT-L in the body of the
> message.
> mailto:[log in to unmask]
>

List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance
To unsubscribe from this list, click the below link. If not already present, place UNSUBSCRIBE RECMGMT-L or UNSUB RECMGMT-L in the body of the message.
mailto:[log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2