On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 8:19 PM, WALLIS Dwight D <
[log in to unmask]> wrote:

>
>
> I don't really think ARMA is the issue. I understand the reaction of
> those who think it is. If you take ARMA out of the equation, I really
> don't understand why this is a problem. Am I missing something?
>


ARMA came into the picture because proponents of a peer-reviewed journal
said the ARMA being "rich" should do it. for the good of the profession.

If you take ARMA out of the equation then proponents should take up the
challenge I made earlier which was to put together a business plan, budget,
get comments for a minimum of 3 years worth of article, get definite
volunteer commitments (reviews, editing, tech) etc then seek out grant
funding.



-- 
Peter Kurilecz CRM CA
[log in to unmask]
Richmond, Va
Information not relevant for my reply has been deleted to reduce the
electronic footprint and to save the sanity of digest subscribers

List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance
To unsubscribe from this list, click the below link. If not already present, place UNSUBSCRIBE RECMGMT-L or UNSUB RECMGMT-L in the body of the message.
mailto:[log in to unmask]