RECMGMT-L Archives

Records Management

RECMGMT-L@LISTSERV.IGGURU.US

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Pilar McAdam <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Records Management Program <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 14 Jan 2010 14:49:29 -0800
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (74 lines)
I'd like to warn those negotiating new or follow-on contracts to be very
watchful of all pricing breakdowns at ALL levels within the proposal
each and every time the vendor comes back with a revision.  

In my experience, a vendor may offer to reduce a service cost during
negotiations.  However, in subsequent reviews of the entire pricing
structure, other changes -- unrequested and unmentioned -- may appear,
and these changes may result in the vendor gaining increased income to
offset the agreed-to reductions.

Examples:

- Reduction in standard pick-up/delivery fees, but addition of a
per-item fee tacked on for every transaction
- Reduced monthly storage fees, but addition of new administrative
charges
- Upon contract renewal, no increase in storage or basic delivery
charges, but standard next-day delivery is being changed to standard
2-day delivery

I guess what I'm saying is that companies are getting very creative in
finding ways to end up getting the same income from a contract, even if
they restructure the sources of that income.

My recommendation would be to develop a standard realistic scenario for
your company/organization that includes a representative spectrum of
typical services over a timeframe, say 3 months.  It might look
something like:

- starting inventory in storage: 28,000 boxes
- box new adds: 750
- box permanent removals: 600
- box destructions: 150
- standard delivery requests: 1,200
- RUSH delivery requests: 75
- after-hours delivery requests: 30
- standard pick-up requests: 60
- etc., depending on the types of services in your contract

Then, using the pricing provided in your quote, extrapolate out the
total cost for the timeframe.

This approach helped us greatly during a recent evaluation of competing
proposals and helped us to recognize when something in the proposal
changed from one version to the next (particularly when the vendor
hadn't highlighted that particular change).

Pilar C. McAdam, CRM
[log in to unmask]
Los Angeles, CA
 
--------------------------------------------------------------------------

Pilar C. McAdam, CRM
Director of Business Intake and Records
333 South Hope Street
43rd Floor
Los Angeles, CA 90071-1448
[log in to unmask]
Direct: 213.617.5417
Fax: 213.443.2703


Circular 230 Notice: In accordance with Treasury Regulations we notify you that any tax advice given herein (or in any attachments) is not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used by any taxpayer, for the purpose of (i) avoiding tax penalties or (ii) promoting, marketing or recommending to another party any transaction or matter addressed herein (or in any attachments).
 
Attention: This message is sent by a law firm and may contain information that is privileged or confidential. If you received this transmission in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and delete the message and any attachments.
http://www.sheppardmullin.com/
--------------------------------------------------------------------------

List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance
To unsubscribe from this list, click the below link. If not already present, place UNSUBSCRIBE RECMGMT-L or UNSUB RECMGMT-L in the body of the message.
mailto:[log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2