Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Tue, 13 Jul 2010 14:42:14 -0400 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
I've been asked by someone why they can use "permanent" labels to mark
incoming construction submittal documents. I've tried explaining to them that
even though a product may be identified as "permanent" doesn't mean it
actually is. It only means the adhesive is not intended as a temporary
attachment like 3M post-its.
They insist however that they've seen label products marked as "permanent"
and they should therefore be allowed to attach a label to the submittials,
which usually have very long (e.g. life of the structure) retention periods.
I have been looking for some sort of standard that I could provide them to
help them understand the differences in what an Avery or label manufacturer
might call "permanent" and what we as records managers, librarians and
archivists consider to be permanent. I know a few years back there had been
some discussion of ANSI developing standards for permanent label adhesive
but it doesn't look like that has been accomplished.
Does anyone have any suggestions for where I could find something to help
me convince these folks that because these records have essentially a
permanent retention period that they need to use ink stamps to identify all the
project information, not labels that will fade, peel or fall off.
Thanks in advance for all your help.
List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance
To unsubscribe from this list, click the below link. If not already present, place UNSUBSCRIBE RECMGMT-L or UNSUB RECMGMT-L in the body of the message.
mailto:[log in to unmask]
|
|
|