Jesse....I can't disagree with any of your points. However, the names for
managing documents, records and content continues to change through the
years. We had DI, EDMS, EDRMS, ECRMS, ECM and a whole host of other
synonyms which I can't remember anymore. Each year it seemed to change.
From my standpoint and to make it easier for users within my organization,
I have started to use CMS....Content Management System over the past few
years. For us it means all information found within the organization
whether it is transitory or official records regardless of the medium. I
believe we are not doing the industry any good by continuing to name,
rename and brand in a certain way. In the RIM field we as professionals
can't agree on a name. How do we expect our users and clients to do
likewise.
So for me, I will continue to use CMS as an all encompassing name.
John Annunziello, CRM, ermm
Manager, Records and Information
Toronto and Region Conservation Authority
[log in to unmask]
"Information is a corporate, strategic asset that needs to be managed"
"*PLEASE CONSIDER THE ENVIRONMENT WHEN DECIDING TO PRINT THIS MESSAGE*
Toronto and Region Conservation Authority Confidentiality Notice:
The information contained in this communication including any attachments
may be confidential, is intended only for use of the recipient(s) named
above, and may be legally privileged. If the reader of the message is not
the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination,
distribution,disclosure or copying of this communication is strictly
prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please
resend this communication to the sender and delete it permanently from
your computer system.
Thank you."
List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance
To unsubscribe from this list, click the below link. If not already present, place UNSUBSCRIBE RECMGMT-L or UNSUB RECMGMT-L in the body of the message.
mailto:[log in to unmask]
|
