RECMGMT-L Archives

Records Management

RECMGMT-L@LISTSERV.IGGURU.US

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Link, Gary M." <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Records Management Program <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 15 Sep 2010 13:07:16 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (31 lines)
>>>
I was leaning toward your suggestion, as well. But, while it is pretty
straight forward to categorize these electronic records differently  -
how would we be able to prevent discovery of the electronic AP
information, since it is still available. I was always under the
impression (perhaps incorrectly) that if we have it, we must produce it.

Does categorizing the records as administrative/operational value and
assigning a historical retention, change the potential for making them
available should a dispute arise in the future?  
<<<

Vlad -- you make an important point. But legal value is only one of the
values we use when scheduling records.


>>>
How about the RM rule of managing information based on content and not
media?
<<<

I did not mean that we schedule the record based on its media, but
rather, based on its use.

Gary

List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance
To unsubscribe from this list, click the below link. If not already present, place UNSUBSCRIBE RECMGMT-L or UNSUB RECMGMT-L in the body of the message.
mailto:[log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2