Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Wed, 15 Sep 2010 13:07:16 -0400 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
>>>
I was leaning toward your suggestion, as well. But, while it is pretty
straight forward to categorize these electronic records differently -
how would we be able to prevent discovery of the electronic AP
information, since it is still available. I was always under the
impression (perhaps incorrectly) that if we have it, we must produce it.
Does categorizing the records as administrative/operational value and
assigning a historical retention, change the potential for making them
available should a dispute arise in the future?
<<<
Vlad -- you make an important point. But legal value is only one of the
values we use when scheduling records.
>>>
How about the RM rule of managing information based on content and not
media?
<<<
I did not mean that we schedule the record based on its media, but
rather, based on its use.
Gary
List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance
To unsubscribe from this list, click the below link. If not already present, place UNSUBSCRIBE RECMGMT-L or UNSUB RECMGMT-L in the body of the message.
mailto:[log in to unmask]
|
|
|