Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Fri, 31 Aug 2012 11:20:34 -0500 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Glen - it is still a record which is out of compliance with your record retention schedule. Is there a hold which causes a need to retain longer? If not - why wouldn't you destroy?
Sent from my iPhone
On Aug 31, 2012, at 10:30 AM, Glen Sanderson <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> Slow Friday so I need to ask this question. If a Record has reached retention, could you then consider it a non-record? Technically after it has met the retention value it does not have any retention value. Just curious I have a flame suit on so it is ok.
> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE:The information in this e-mail may be confidential and/or privileged and protected by work product immunity or other legal rules. No confidentiality or privilege is waived or lost by mistransmission. If you are not the intended recipient or an authorized representative of the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any review, dissemination, or copying of this e-mail and its attachments, if any, or the information contained herein is prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please immediately notify the sender by return e-mail and delete this e-mail from your computer system. Thank you.
>
> List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
> Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance
> To unsubscribe from this list, click the below link. If not already present, place UNSUBSCRIBE RECMGMT-L or UNSUB RECMGMT-L in the body of the message.
> mailto:[log in to unmask]
List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance
To unsubscribe from this list, click the below link. If not already present, place UNSUBSCRIBE RECMGMT-L or UNSUB RECMGMT-L in the body of the message.
mailto:[log in to unmask]
|
|
|