Well good luck with all that.
In short we have given up many of those rights to privacy for the sake of
convenience and fun.
If you go back the list posts to the dark days (OK we deleted those days,
but if you could...) you could read many posts on how you can have no
expectation of privacy. Prince Charles can give you tips on phone privacy.
For all those trying to exert a claim to privacy, you are trying to put the
genie back in the bottle. Major Nelson could tell you how hard that is.

As far privacy in yur communiaction, send a letter (while the post office
wtill exists) or call on a land line (while they still exist). Those tools
require court intervention and justificaiton to eavesdrop. Too bad they are
going away.

Chris Flynn

On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 1:19 AM, Jay Maechtlen <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/**NSA_warrantless_surveillance_**controversy<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NSA_warrantless_surveillance_controversy>
>
> https://www.eff.org/nsa-spying
>
> http://www.cnn.com/2012/10/09/**justice/court-surveillance/**index.html<http://www.cnn.com/2012/10/09/justice/court-surveillance/index.html>
>
> AT&T provided National Security Agency eavesdroppers with full access to
> its customers' phone calls, and shunted its customers' internet traffic to
> data-mining equipment installed in a secret room in its San Francisco
> switching center, according to a former AT&T worker cooperating in the
> Electronic Frontier Foundation's lawsuit against the company.
>
>
> On 12/4/2012 10:41 PM, Larry Medina wrote:
>
>> This guy doesn't sound very believable when he makes comments like:
>>
>> " I would assume, that..."
>>
>> " I don’t think they are..."
>>
>> "I believe I’ve been on it..."
>>
>> "I don’t really know, but I certainly think..."
>>
>> "We would have been able to do that..."
>>
>> I don't know if this dood REALLY knows anything, but it IS WELL KNOWN that
>> certain combinations of terms in messages do trigger filters and encourage
>> groups like the NSA to start paying attention to your message traffic.
>>
>> The trick is to know what those combined terms are and TOTALLY avoid using
>> them =)
>>
>> Larry
>> [log in to unmask]
>>
>>   --
>> *Lawrence J. Medina
>> Danville, CA
>> RIM Professional since 1972
>>
>>
> --
> Jay Maechtlen
> 626 444-5112 office
> 626 840-8875 cell
> www.laserpubs.com
>
>
>
> List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/**recmgmt-l.html<http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html>
> Contact [log in to unmask]**edu<[log in to unmask]>for assistance
> To unsubscribe from this list, click the below link. If not already
> present, place UNSUBSCRIBE RECMGMT-L or UNSUB RECMGMT-L in the body of the
> message.
> mailto:[log in to unmask]**body=unsubscribe%20RECMGMT-L
>

List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance
To unsubscribe from this list, click the below link. If not already present, place UNSUBSCRIBE RECMGMT-L or UNSUB RECMGMT-L in the body of the message.
mailto:[log in to unmask]