To Scan or Not To Scan That is the Question - Electronic Discovery Blog

The magistrate judge held that the defendants were not required to produce
the scanned version of the property receipts, and had met their discovery
obligations by permitting plaintiffs to inspect and copy the receipts.  The
judge held that plaintiffs should not get the benefit of the electronic
imaging when the defendants had incurred the expense of conversion, and
further held that plaintiffs had received the receipts in the original
paper format.
The district court reversed, holding that plaintiffs were entitled to the
digital versions of the receipts.


http://bit.ly/174IMGK

Source:
http://www.electronicdiscoveryblog.com/to-scan-or-not-to-scan-that-is-the-question/?utm_source=feedly
See if people are clicking on this link: http://bit.ly/174IMGK+
Try the bitly.com sidebar to see who is talking about a page on the web:
http://bitly.com/pages/sidebar

List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance
To unsubscribe from this list, click the below link. If not already present, place UNSUBSCRIBE RECMGMT-L or UNSUB RECMGMT-L in the body of the message.
mailto:[log in to unmask]