Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Fri, 26 Feb 2016 13:10:17 -0800 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 11:57 AM, King, Richard G - (kingr) <
[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> I thought the fire code 232 for storage facilities says no battery
> chargers in the storage area. Big or small it's a charger with attendant
> risks. Is that right Hugh? Dick King, University of Arizona - Records
> Management and Archives
> ________________________________________
>
>
> Obviously, to a degree, we should have a certain level of concern (as
> individuals) with this issue, but as RMs I don't think it's critical...
> with the exception of any devices we may have in storage areas that remain
> in chargers when the area/s are unattended.
>
No battery chargers for electric forklifts or things of that nature, but to
be honest Dick, I don't think it thought to cover things like hand-held
devices such as bar code readers or walkie talkies or smartphones, all of
which may be powered by Li-Ion batteries now.
I mean, think about how long it has taken for us to even get meaty language
to cover "electronic format records" in there.
Larry
--
Larry
[log in to unmask]
*----Lawrence J. MedinaDanville, CARIM Professional since 1972*
List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance
To unsubscribe from this list, click the below link. If not already present, place UNSUBSCRIBE RECMGMT-L or UNSUB RECMGMT-L in the body of the message.
mailto:[log in to unmask]
|
|
|