RECMGMT-L Archives

Records Management

RECMGMT-L@LISTSERV.IGGURU.US

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Records Management Email <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Records Management Program <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 21 Apr 2016 21:37:01 +0000
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (48 lines)
Aloha All,

Back from a well-needed vacation and decided to chime on this issue...

I agree with Glen that the "record" versus "official record" is a needed distinction and extremely relevant...I agree that everything in a "legal sense" despite what format or media it is created or transmitted.  However, the issue is whether the "record" is an "official" representation of the "intent" of the company or originator of the message and whether it correctly represents what was created in the "normal course" of business.  It is extremely relevant to make the distinction between an "official" representation of fact or one's views versus something that may have been altered or created informally.

Yes, I believe that Glen is correct that this issue needs to be discussed at length...

Mahalo,

Brian

-----Original Message-----
In reading the post, I followed the link and looked around the site.  While reading the 8 Rules for Next Generation Records Management, the very first rule.
Rule 1 -"Debating whether an item of information is a ‘record’ or ‘non-record’ is no longer relevant. E-discovery makes all recorded information – regardless of format – a ‘record’"
IMO, I have to disagree with for the following reasons:
1-If it isn't requested in a lawsuit it is not a record(unless it fits the definition of a record).
2-e-discovery does not make all recorded information a record, it may have the potential but it doesn't do it.  E-discovery and the eventual churning through of data doesn't make everything responsive.
3-And I believe it is relevant to discuss.
I would like to know the rationale behind that rule.

Respectfully,

Glen



----------------------------------------------------------
At First Hawaiian Bank, we care about the environment.  
Please consider our planet's limited resources before 
printing this email.

This email is intended only for the person or entity
to which it is addressed and may contain confidential 
information.  Any review, retransmission, dissemination 
or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon, 
this information by persons or entities other than the 
intended recipient is prohibited.  If you receive this 
e-mail in error, please contact the sender by replying 
to this e-mail and delete this e-mail and any attachments 
from all computers without reading or saving the same 
in any manner whatsoever.

List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance
To unsubscribe from this list, click the below link. If not already present, place UNSUBSCRIBE RECMGMT-L or UNSUB RECMGMT-L in the body of the message.
mailto:[log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2