if the records are long-lived then one could also create a microfilm
preservation at the same time that the paper copies are scanned.
On Wed, Jan 11, 2017 at 10:56 AM, Frederic Grevin <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> Whilst I agree in principle with Ginny's remarks, there is another
> possible reason for keeping the paper copies: if these are very long-lived
> records (as in "multiple decades"), the paper is likely to be easier and
> less expensive to preserve than the digital copies.
>
--
Peter Kurilecz CRM CA IGP
[log in to unmask]
Dallas, Texas
Save our in-boxes! http://emailcharter.orghttp://twitter.com/RAINbytehttp://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/RAINbyte/http://paper.li/RAINbyte/rainbytehttps://groups.google.com/d/forum/archives-in-the-news
Information not relevant for my reply has been deleted to reduce the
electronic footprint and to save the sanity of digest subscribers
List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance
To unsubscribe from this list, click the below link. If not already present, place UNSUBSCRIBE RECMGMT-L or UNSUB RECMGMT-L in the body of the message.
mailto:[log in to unmask]