RECMGMT-L Archives

Records Management

RECMGMT-L@LISTSERV.IGGURU.US

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"David T. Macknet" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Date:
Thu, 21 Jan 2010 07:24:20 -0800
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (75 lines)
 http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2009/oct/04/british-library-digital-archives
[1]">http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2009/oct/04/british-library-digital-archives
might be of interest, as it highlights the issue and provides some
background. 
http://services.parliament.uk/bills/2009-10/digitalheritage.html
[2]">http://services.parliament.uk/bills/2009-10/digitalheritage.html is
the parliament's "progress meter" of where the bill sits within the
parliamentary process.  The second page links out to
http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200910/cmhansrd/cm100120/debtext/100120-0006.htm#10012070000001
[3]">http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200910/cmhansrd/cm100120/debtext/100120-0006.htm#10012070000001
which was its first reading (Tom Watson was granted 10 minutes in which to
discuss his bill).  He was called out of order and his bill wasn't read.

 Hope that helps.

 -D

		David T. Macknet

		Photography [4]

		Blog [5]

 On Thu 21/01/10 2:58 PM , Peter Kurilecz [log in to unmask] sent:
 "...a Bill to enable specified institutions to make digital copies of
 cultural artefacts for archival purposes not withstanding the existence
of
 any intellectual property right; and for connected purposes..."
 http://bit.ly/5UsbjA [6]">http://bit.ly/5UsbjA

 here is the link to it on the Parliament website
 http://bit.ly/8Tv8W0 [7]">http://bit.ly/8Tv8W0

 does anyone in the UK have the text of the bill?

 -- 
 Peter Kurilecz CRM CA
 [log in to unmask] [8]
 Richmond, Va
 http://twitter.com/RAINbyte [9]">http://twitter.com/RAINbyte
 Information not relevant for my reply has been deleted to reduce the
 electronic footprint and to save the sanity of digest subscribers

 List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
[10]">http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
 Contact [log in to unmask] [11] for assistance
 To unsubscribe from this list, click the below link. If not already
present, place UNSUBSCRIBE RECMGMT-L or UNSUB RECMGMT-L in the body of the
message.
 [log in to unmask] [12]?body=unsubscribe%20RECMGMT-L

 

Links:
------
[1]
http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2009/oct/04/british-library-digital-archives
[2] http://services.parliament.uk/bills/2009-10/digitalheritage.html
[3]
http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200910/cmhansrd/cm100120/debtext/100120-0006.htm#10012070000001
[4] http://www.flickr.com/photos/wishiwerebaking/
[5] http://davimack.members.sonic.net/blog/
[6] http://bit.ly/5UsbjA
[7] http://bit.ly/8Tv8W0
[8] mailto:[log in to unmask]
[9] http://twitter.com/RAINbyte
[10] http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
[11] mailto:[log in to unmask]
[12] mailto:[log in to unmask]

List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance
To unsubscribe from this list, click the below link. If not already present, place UNSUBSCRIBE RECMGMT-L or UNSUB RECMGMT-L in the body of the message.
mailto:[log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2