On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 5:13 PM, Stephen M. Garner <
[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
> Regarding the PG&E mess that is happening now, what I understand from
> the SF Examiner article (http://bit.ly/isf9nW) was that the memo's in
> question were produced by PG&E in response to subpoena - they weren't
> trying to hide them. The SJ Mercury News article
> (http://bit.ly/lcqSsX) seems to imply an earlier production of those
> records by a former PG&E employee, perhaps by subpoena or with PG&E's
> approval, to U.S. Rep. Jackie Speier, D-Hillsborough.
>
>
the two stories deal with two different things. the Examiner story is about
records that had been requested from PG&E. The San Mateo County Times story
concerns memos that that had been shared with a Congresswoman. I know the
back story on the memos, but I will leave it up to LarryM to tell that story
If you go here you can read the memos in questions. note that personal
information was redacted which calls into question how did the San Mateo
paper get Larry's name?
http://docs.cpuc.ca.gov/efile/RULINGS/137470.pdf
The San Francisco Chronicle also published a story (which was posted earlier
today) about the memos, but did not name Larry.
--
Peter Kurilecz CRM CA
[log in to unmask]
Richmond, Va
http://twitter.com/RAINbytehttp://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/RAINbyte/http://paper.li/RAINbyte/rainbyte
Information not relevant for my reply has been deleted to reduce the
electronic footprint and to save the sanity of digest subscribers
List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance
To unsubscribe from this list, click the below link. If not already present, place UNSUBSCRIBE RECMGMT-L or UNSUB RECMGMT-L in the body of the message.
mailto:[log in to unmask]
