RECMGMT-L Archives

Records Management

RECMGMT-L@LISTSERV.IGGURU.US

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Nolene Sherman <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Records Management Program <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 24 Oct 2012 18:34:34 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (26 lines)
We are updating our retention schedule and are refining record categories 
relating to HR benefits. Particularly we are separating categories for health and 
welfare benefits from those for retirement benefits, since we feel the HW stuff 
can have a much shorter retention period. 

Our company engages an outside counsel to work with us for our retirement 
issues. The attorney has cited ERISA sec 209 and its "open-ended" retention 
requirements (as long as needed to determine benefits) and recommends a 
permanent retention for anything related to retirement benefits. We're a 120-
year-old company which will presumably stay around for a lot longer, so 
permanent really is a very long time for us. We understand that retirement 
related problems usually don't surface until the person retires, but we're 
thinking a 60 to 75 year retention (from termination of employee or termination 
of plan) should be sufficient to cover 99% of any issues that may come up.

I'm curious to know how other companies have scheduled retirement related 
records and what the thinking is behind their choice.

Nolene Sherman
[log in to unmask]

List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance
To unsubscribe from this list, click the below link. If not already present, place UNSUBSCRIBE RECMGMT-L or UNSUB RECMGMT-L in the body of the message.
mailto:[log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2