RECMGMT-L Archives

Records Management

RECMGMT-L@LISTSERV.IGGURU.US
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Re: Permanent vs Really-Really-Long-Time
From:
NKhramtsovsky <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Records Management Program <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 25 Oct 2012 21:42:46 +0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (15 lines) 
> I'm curious to know how other companies have scheduled retirement related
> records and what the thinking is behind their choice.
> > Nolene Sherman

In my country quite often the following retention rules are used: “Keep NN 
years, then re-appraise”  i.e. kick the can down the road :)

With my best wishes,
Natasha Khramtsovsky 

List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance
To unsubscribe from this list, click the below link. If not already present, place UNSUBSCRIBE RECMGMT-L or UNSUB RECMGMT-L in the body of the message.
mailto:[log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2