RECMGMT-L Archives

Records Management

RECMGMT-L@LISTSERV.IGGURU.US

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
John Phillips <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Records Management Program <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sat, 17 Nov 2012 20:06:15 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (79 lines)
John,

Just out of curiosity - when a "typical lawyer" (Inside/Outside Counsel)
tells their management/client that they have created a retention schedule,
what sources/processes do you think they used? I often hear Corporate
Counsels in small organizations say the "did" the retention schedule
themselves, when they often seem marginally informed about records
management in general. I doubt any of them used Retention or Retention
Manager software, for instance.

John

***************************
John Phillips
Information Technology Decisions
www.infotechdecisions.net


-----Original Message-----
From: Records Management Program [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf
Of John Montaņa
Sent: Friday, November 16, 2012 9:52 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Friday Pondering 11-16-2012

Absolutely.  If someone claims they've found every single requirement in the
country, either they're fibbing or they don't know what they're doing.
There's no way to even know such a thing, much less guarantee it.

John

Sent from my iPhone

On Nov 16, 2012, at 9:46 PM, Peter Kurilecz <[log in to unmask]>
wrote:

> John raises a good point. No matter what you use to begin your 
> retention work it is just the beginning. you need to review and 
> verify. No service can find everything in the regulations. No knock 
> against what John and The Donald produced but occasionally i found that
they had missed items.
> Remember the key phrase
> 
> Trust, but verify.
> 
> On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 8:13 PM, John Montana < 
> [log in to unmask]> wrote:
> 
>>  So use it, but by all means don't assume that it's comprehensive.
> --
> Peter Kurilecz CRM CA
> [log in to unmask]
> Richmond, Va
> http://twitter.com/RAINbyte
> http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/RAINbyte/
> http://paper.li/RAINbyte/rainbyte
> http://pinterest.com/pakurilecz/archives/
> http://pinterest.com/pakurilecz/records-management/
> http://www.linkedin.com/in/peterakurilecz
> Information not relevant for my reply has been deleted to reduce the 
> electronic footprint and to save the sanity of digest subscribers
> 
> List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
> Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance To unsubscribe 
> from this list, click the below link. If not already present, place
UNSUBSCRIBE RECMGMT-L or UNSUB RECMGMT-L in the body of the message.
> mailto:[log in to unmask]

List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance To unsubscribe from
this list, click the below link. If not already present, place UNSUBSCRIBE
RECMGMT-L or UNSUB RECMGMT-L in the body of the message.
mailto:[log in to unmask]

List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance
To unsubscribe from this list, click the below link. If not already present, place UNSUBSCRIBE RECMGMT-L or UNSUB RECMGMT-L in the body of the message.
mailto:[log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2