Peter is right, let's keep the "non-record" content offline. Stats like
these are endlessly misinterpreted and misused. Look at the sources and
their known agendas.
The issue is how Public Records can be used or misused and the Privacy
implications.
***************************
John Phillips
Information Technology Decisions
www.infotechdecisions.net
-----Original Message-----
From: Records Management Program [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf
Of Thomas Munzer
Sent: Friday, January 04, 2013 2:46 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Newtown shootings - with a bit of non-record content
A number of excellent posts, to be sure. I must admit to being uneasy by the
publishing of this information. But are these public records or not? And if
not, on what grounds, and from whom would they not be?
The somewhat non-records part:
I thought the knowledge, or just the likelihood, of guns being present in
public buildings, or carried in a concealed manner, is supposed to be a
deterrent to gun deaths. By that standard, we should be the safest country
in the world. Unfortunately...
By the way, gun deaths per 100,000 of population:
US 10.2
UK .25
Source: UN, WHO
Tom Munzer
Washington, DC
________________________________
List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance To unsubscribe from
this list, click the below link. If not already present, place UNSUBSCRIBE
RECMGMT-L or UNSUB RECMGMT-L in the body of the message.
mailto:[log in to unmask]
List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance
To unsubscribe from this list, click the below link. If not already present, place UNSUBSCRIBE RECMGMT-L or UNSUB RECMGMT-L in the body of the message.
mailto:[log in to unmask]
|
