Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Fri, 1 Mar 2013 09:18:14 -0500 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Dwight,
Great point. As records managers we need to somehow get ourselves a
set on the table or at least ensure we are looked at as an important
stakeholder, preferably sooner than later.
If my memory serves me correctly I believe NARA was working with the
Federal CIO's to include Records Management as part of the system
development life-cycle (SDLC) for federal IT projects. The idea was
to get records managers involved in the develop of these systems. I
did a cursory review of NARA's website but couldn't find any reference
to the initiative.
As you point out almost every system these days creates and/or
maintains records in some form or fashion. One way to get in the
process is by reaching out to your IT department and/or Project
Management Office (PMO) if your organization has one. You might find
some resistance initially - point out some of the horror stories that
have been posted on the listserve.
Bruce White, CRM, PMP
Virginia Beach, VA
e-mail: [log in to unmask]
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/bblanco
On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 5:09 PM, Dwight WALLIS
<[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> In these kinds of environments, I honestly believe that records management
> has a unique perspective - a long range view. If the records generated by a
> given system pass the stability "life-cycle" test (and almost all of these
> systems have a records keeping component), that may reflect well on the
> sustainability of the system itself in a given organization, particularly
> in a climate of continual "creative destruction".
List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance
To unsubscribe from this list, click the below link. If not already present, place UNSUBSCRIBE RECMGMT-L or UNSUB RECMGMT-L in the body of the message.
mailto:[log in to unmask]
|
|
|