Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Wed, 27 Mar 2013 11:58:39 -0400 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Dearest All,
This was a really interesting conversation yesterday on the listserv that
had a lot of different facets to it. I was particularly interested in
someone calling anything that needed to be preserved (for an undisclosed
lower limit of time) a "record" and then further refining that to "business
records" if it was listed on the retention schedule and "legal hold record"
if it was needed for litigation production. My thoughts on the issue were
too lengthy to put here, so I wrote them up here http://bit.ly/YIkKsZ .
Tell me if I'm wrong, but preserving something doesn't make it a "record"
and putting it in an application to preserve it doesn't make it a "record"
either.
Best wishes,
Carol
Carol E.B. Choksy, PhD CRM PMP
CEO
IRAD Strategic Consulting, Inc.
<mailto:[log in to unmask]> [log in to unmask]
317-294-8329
Adjunct Lecturer
School of Library and Information Science
Indiana University, Bloomington
<mailto:[log in to unmask]> [log in to unmask]
IRAD watermark 2 copy
List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance
To unsubscribe from this list, click the below link. If not already present, place UNSUBSCRIBE RECMGMT-L or UNSUB RECMGMT-L in the body of the message.
mailto:[log in to unmask]
|
|
|