RECMGMT-L Archives

Records Management

RECMGMT-L@LISTSERV.IGGURU.US

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Peter Kurilecz <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Records Management Program <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 2 Jul 2013 13:07:03 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (34 lines)
having looked at dozens of retention schedules over the years, I prefer
seeing the trigger event being explicitly shown as in
Employment Termination + x years.
since many times the trigger is buried in the notes/description and most
users only look at the retention column

On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 10:24 AM, Anne Pfeffer <[log in to unmask]>wrote:

>
> In our schedule we define when active ceases...such as with employment
> termination, expiration of contract, disposition of asset, etc.  So the
> ACT+XX is still the requirement but the trigger is defined in the schedule
> notes.
>


-- 
Peter Kurilecz CRM CA
[log in to unmask]
Richmond, Va
http://twitter.com/RAINbyte
http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/RAINbyte/
http://paper.li/RAINbyte/rainbyte
http://pinterest.com/pakurilecz/archives/
http://pinterest.com/pakurilecz/records-management/
http://www.linkedin.com/in/peterakurilecz
Information not relevant for my reply has been deleted to reduce the
electronic footprint and to save the sanity of digest subscribers

List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance
To unsubscribe from this list, click the below link. If not already present, place UNSUBSCRIBE RECMGMT-L or UNSUB RECMGMT-L in the body of the message.
mailto:[log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2