from one of the many articles I saw over the weekend apparently the reason for turning off the system is because it is still spewing water and turning it off reduces more water damage to the boxes. hopefully Hugh Smith will chime in (he's on digest) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fire_sprinkler_system On Mon, Feb 2, 2015 at 11:48 AM, Stakhov, Gene <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > Also, I wasn't aware of the sprinkler head replacement protocol - but > seems like that's what actually caused the second blaze to get out of > control so quickly. Why not just leave the sprinkler system ON while > waiting for the replacements?? > > > -- Peter Kurilecz CRM CA IGP [log in to unmask] Dallas, Texas Save our in-boxes! http://emailcharter.org http://twitter.com/RAINbyte http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/RAINbyte/ http://paper.li/RAINbyte/rainbyte https://groups.google.com/d/forum/archives-in-the-news http://pinterest.com/pakurilecz/archives/ http://pinterest.com/pakurilecz/records-management/ http://www.linkedin.com/in/peterakurilecz #*CantbeworsethanPeterk* <https://twitter.com/hashtag/CantbeworsethanPeterk?src=hash> Information not relevant for my reply has been deleted to reduce the electronic footprint and to save the sanity of digest subscribers List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance To unsubscribe from this list, click the below link. If not already present, place UNSUBSCRIBE RECMGMT-L or UNSUB RECMGMT-L in the body of the message. mailto:[log in to unmask]