RECMGMT-L Archives

Records Management

RECMGMT-L@LISTSERV.IGGURU.US
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Citing Proportionality, Court Concludes it would be "Senseless" to Require Plaintiff to "Go to Great Lengths" to Produce Evidence Defendants are "Able to Do Without" : Electronic Discovery Law
From:
PeterK <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Records Management Program <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 3 Sep 2013 21:41:26 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (21 lines) 
Court Concludes it would be "Senseless" to Require Plaintiff to "Go to
Great Lengths" to Produce Evidence
Relying on the “all-to-often [sic] ignored discovery principle” of
proportionality the court declined to compel Plaintiff "to go to great
lengths” to produce information that the defendants could “do without.”



http://bit.ly/17CZryf

Source:
http://www.ediscoverylaw.com/2013/09/articles/case-summaries/citing-proportionality-court-concludes-it-would-be-senseless-to-require-plaintiff-to-go-to-great-lengths-to-produce-evidence-defendants-are-able-to-do-without/
See if people are clicking on this link: http://bit.ly/17CZryf+
Try the bitly.com sidebar to see who is talking about a page on the web:
http://bitly.com/pages/sidebar

List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance
To unsubscribe from this list, click the below link. If not already present, place UNSUBSCRIBE RECMGMT-L or UNSUB RECMGMT-L in the body of the message.
mailto:[log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2