I realized it had been cancelled, but I did get a copy of the original directive off of an "archived" DOD web page. I found it interesting that Xerox is citing a cancelled directive.


>DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com;
>                     h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references;
>                     b=mLE6zsXQJEOU7r/H1tPtTVuWIKvunLpqNQLje0+Ez1zuiAjj3DyOWmZtQ6AJSUiMkvwPZOuZY1SloG7t/n/ANZpEQkap1fCTmtnaC87oepqcdRlJALGUl3ud7K9I5D374s4rn6SpN8Bcm3a3XJbFDlXfd8zDBUPE/pLnmjKuWQI=
>X-Spam-Status: hits=-1.428, required=5, tests=BAYES_20
>X-UFL-Spam-Status: hits=-1.428, required=5, tests=BAYES_20
>X-Scanned-By: CNS Open Systems Group
>              (http://open-systems.ufl.edu/services/smtp-relay/)
>X-UFL-Scanned-By: CNS Open Systems Group
>                  (http://open-systems.ufl.edu/services/smtp-relay/)
>Date:         Wed, 22 Dec 2004 11:41:01 -0500
>Reply-To: Peter Kurilecz <[log in to unmask]>
>Sender: Records Management Program <[log in to unmask]>
>From: Peter Kurilecz <[log in to unmask]>
>Subject:      DOD5200.28-M was Re: [RM] Xerox Work Centre Pro 65/75/90
>To: [log in to unmask]
>
>it appears that the subject DOD directive has been cancelled. see the
>following DOD directive
>
>http://www.biometrics.dod.mil/documents/InformationAssuarance/DoDD85001.pdf
>
>pak
>
>
>On Wed, 22 Dec 2004 11:33:33 -0500, Peter Kurilecz <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>> here is one more link about Data remanence
>> http://security.isu.edu/pdf/dataremanence.pdf
>>
>> pa
>>
>
>List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
>Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance

List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance