Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Wed, 4 May 2005 22:32:59 -0700 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
As mentioned by many others, it's not the frequency with which with occurs
or the percentage of losses, it's the fact that it did take place and the
insensitivity and sheer arrogance displayed by Iron Mountain's spokesperson
and CEO when the facts DID come out. They immediately launched into a "blame
the customer, fire the pick-up boy" mode to cover their obvious incompetence
and failed process structure and refused to say they did something wrong,
and what they've done to see it doesn't happen again.
Look at the difference between how Wendy's restaurants responded to the
recent "finger" issue versus how IM responded to this. Wendy's said what
they were doing to look into the issue, provided many details of how the
investigation was proceeding, never attempted to say they weren't at fault
until they were able to PROVE they weren't, didn't blame the local manager,
and subsequently explained in great detail how they had investigated all
steps leading up to the incident (interviewing all suppliers and
sub-suppliers, employees) and everyone else in the potential "chain of
custody". Then they mounted a public relations policy to bring back the
customer's faith in their ability to do things right...
Seen any of that in this case??
Larry
List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance
|
|
|