Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Thu, 27 Sep 2012 12:02:38 -0400 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Why? What is the purpose? What is the reason? What would one
accomplish? Darn sure would not be limiting potential liability/risk; and
would increase costs, not reduce costs.
Best regards, Steve
Steven D. Whitaker, CRM
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 11:21 AM, Ralph Better <[log in to unmask]>wrote:
> It is my undertanding that there are currenlty two valid disposal
> alternatives for records. The first is documented destruction and the
> second is sending records to the archives.
>
> Hypothetically, there is now a third method. Dispose of records to a
> repository outside US jurisdiction. Electronic records, created, used and
> maintained outside the US,can be disposed of by transferring records into a
> storage server that is not subject to US authority. The records could be
> maintained and even used as long as they are never moved within the US
> jurisdiction.
>
> Ralph Better
>
> List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
> Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance
> To unsubscribe from this list, click the below link. If not already
> present, place UNSUBSCRIBE RECMGMT-L or UNSUB RECMGMT-L in the body of the
> message.
> mailto:[log in to unmask]
>
--
List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance
To unsubscribe from this list, click the below link. If not already present, place UNSUBSCRIBE RECMGMT-L or UNSUB RECMGMT-L in the body of the message.
mailto:[log in to unmask]
|
|
|