LISTSERV - RECMGMT-L Archives - LISTSERV.IGGURU.US

RECMGMT-L Archives

Records Management

RECMGMT-L@LISTSERV.IGGURU.US

	LISTSERV Archives
	RECMGMT-L Home

	Log In
	Register

	Subscribe or Unsubscribe

	Search Archives

Options:	Use Forum View Use Monospaced Font Show Text Part by Default Show All Mail Headers
Message:	[<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic:	[<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author:	[<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Subject:	Case study/articles regarding records retention standards
From:	Paula Sutton <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:	Records Management Program <[log in to unmask]>
Date:	Tue, 18 Nov 2014 09:51:26 -0700
Content-Type:	text/plain
Parts/Attachments:	text/plain (26 lines)

Good day,
I am updating a retention schedule for an highly regulated power company
who has used *permanent *and *indefinite *liberally throughout their
retention schedule. In my update I would like to change these to "life of
asset," "life of plant," "termination + yrs." etc.

They are wanting to see articles and case studies on why the use of *permanent
*and *indefinite *should be changed.  To jump start my research, I was
hoping that the esteemed colleagues on the listserv could point me in the
direction of some recent articles, publications or case studies.

Many thanks!

-- 
*Paula Sutton, *CRM, IGP
Records and Information Governance Consultant
Records Matter LLC
(970) 776-0285
[log in to unmask]
www.linkedin.com/in/paulasutton/

List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance
To unsubscribe from this list, click the below link. If not already present, place UNSUBSCRIBE RECMGMT-L or UNSUB RECMGMT-L in the body of the message.
mailto:[log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2

LISTSERV.IGGURU.US