RECMGMT-L Archives

Records Management

RECMGMT-L@LISTSERV.IGGURU.US
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Re: Case study/articles regarding records retention standards
From:
NKhramtsovsky <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Records Management Program <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 21 Nov 2014 09:54:04 +0300
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (12 lines) 
Ginny Jones wrote: "...If the actual value of the record is 100 years (or whatever) - the retention should be 100 years (or whatever) - not permanent."

Or else the records may be scheduled as follows "Keep for NN years, then re-appraise".

With my best regards,
Natasha Khramtsovsky

List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance
To unsubscribe from this list, click the below link. If not already present, place UNSUBSCRIBE RECMGMT-L or UNSUB RECMGMT-L in the body of the message.
mailto:[log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2