RECMGMT-L Archives

Records Management

RECMGMT-L@LISTSERV.IGGURU.US

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Larry Medina <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Records Management Program <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 25 Feb 2015 11:52:18 -0800
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (38 lines)
On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 11:38 AM, Ben Greene <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> Are there any industry standards on how long an acceptable period is
> between
> communicating an email hold to IT and actually placing the mailbox on
> hold? I
> have 'argued' that just because the technology may be at your fingertips
> and
> you can possibly implement a hold almost instantly, having a consistent
> reasonable period (few days) is not only defensible, but probably the
> better
> approach.
>

Get reaction?

You better be able to explain why, with the technology being what it is, it
can't happen nearly instantly.

I think in the current state of technology multiple days would NOT be seen
as 'acceptable'.  IT might be required to institute a technological means
to implement a hold, but if the hold is communicated to all impacted
parties, THEY can ensure that they take no actions on their personal mail
stores.

-- 
Larry
[log in to unmask]



*----Lawrence J. MedinaDanville, CARIM Professional since 1972*

List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance
To unsubscribe from this list, click the below link. If not already present, place UNSUBSCRIBE RECMGMT-L or UNSUB RECMGMT-L in the body of the message.
mailto:[log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2