RECMGMT-L Archives

Records Management

RECMGMT-L@LISTSERV.IGGURU.US

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Allen, Doug" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Records Management Program <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 20 Apr 2005 13:19:52 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (69 lines)
At the very least, I believe that a "non-destruct" order or a "hold" placed
on destruction would stop the destruction of any media on which email and
other electronic records were held, until there was some "specificity"
stating that a backup copy would be sufficient.  I would not want to be
caught destroying any primary copy, or any duplicate copy, unless there was
some specificity in a "non-destruct order"......

Douglas P. Allen, CRM, CDIA+
Business Development Manager
Global 360
3103 Sasparilla Cove
Austin, TX 78748
(512) 292-3817 -- direct
(512) 791-8027 -- cell phone

http://www.global360.com



-----Original Message-----
From: Records Management Program [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf
Of Piotrowski, Charles
Sent: Wednesday, April 20, 2005 12:10 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Non-Destruct Notices and Back-Up Tapes

Hi Folks,



After reviewing my Business Laws, Inc. trilogy in 3 rings I am left with the
following question...



When a Non-Destruct Notice is issued, whet effect does it have on back-up
tapes (email and other electronic records)?



If back-up tapes are written over at the end of two weeks, does the
Non-Destruct prohibit the recycling?





Thanks,

-Chuck



Chuck Piotrowski

CVPS

Records Manager

(802)747-5447



List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance

List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance

ATOM RSS1 RSS2