I am aware of the information that is out there related to why records need
to be placed on hold and how important this is.  What I am trying to find
out is whether or not there are other Records Managers out there who are
actually being held responsible for the communication of holds within their
organization.  In my 20+ years of RM experience the Legal department in the
organizations that I have worked are always responsible for notificatoin of
hold requirements since they are the ones who deal with the litigation
discovery requests details, etc.  It would be great to know if there are any
other Records Managers out there that have reservations about taking on this
responsibility or if I am just being overly cautious.

Thanks.



On 6/22/06, Linda Wynne <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
> Hi Everyone:
>
>
>
> ARMA has great info about holds especially a paper written by John J.
> Isaza, Esq.  The title is "Legal Holds & Spoliation:  Identifying a
> Checklist of Considerations that Trigger the Duty to Preserve."
>
>
>
> Check out the March/April 2005 issue of The Information Management
> Journal for an article, "Know When to Hold'Em, When to Destroy'Em"
> written by the same author as above.
>
>
>
> Linda
>
>
> List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
> Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance
>

List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance